Integrated Learning Management in the Implementation of the Independent Curriculum at SDN Kagok 01 Tegal Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47453/edubase.v6i1.3212Keywords:
Integrated Learning, Merdeka Curriculum, Integrated Learning Management, Elementary Education.Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the planning, implementation, and assessment of integrated learning conducted by teachers at SDN Kagok 01, Tegal Regency, during the 2022/2023 academic year. Methods: This study used a qualitative approach. The subjects or respondents in this study were first-grade teachers and all first-grade students. Data collection techniques used included interviews, observation, and document analysis. The data analysis method applied in this study follows the model proposed by Miles and Huberman, which consists of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing (verification). The findings indicate that the learning planning process carried out by class teachers has been carried out effectively. In preparing for learning, teachers develop lesson plans using "Teaching Modules" (Modul Ajar or MA) as required by the Independent Curriculum. In addition, teachers prepare learning media or teaching aids for use in the classroom. Teaching materials are contextualized using real-world examples, in accordance with the principles of contextual learning. The implementation of the integrated learning program by class teachers has been effective. Integrated learning activities include introductory, core, and closing activities, all carried out systematically. In terms of assessment, teacher evaluation practices align with the lesson plan. These assessments include cognitive (knowledge-based) evaluations and skills-based or performance-based evaluations of student actions.
Downloads
References
Alali, R. M., & Al-Barakat, A. A. (2024). Assessing early childhood teachers’ perceptions of
the role of the integrative curriculum in promoting children’s learning experiences.
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 989–1000.
https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2202
Andani, W., Martha, S., & Rizki, S. W. (2024). Accreditation Classification of Junior High
School in Indonesia Using K-Nearest Neighbor, Logistic Regression, Classification Tree.
AIP Conference Proceedings, 3132(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0212970
Arjanto, P., Bafadal, I., Atmoko, A., Sunandar, A., & Wiwenly Senduk, F. F. (2023).
Optimizing Indonesian Education Through National Standards: Implications for
Engineering and Computer Science. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference,
FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10342981
Bart, A. C., Subramanian, K., Anderson, R. E., & Hamid, N. A. (2018). Preparing, visualizing,
and using real-world data in introductory courses. SIGCSE 2018 - Proceedings of the 49th
ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2018-January, 676–677.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159616
Benson, S. (2011). Does problem based learning deliver the goods? Proceedings of the IADIS
International Conference e-Learning 2011, Part of the IADIS Multi Conference on
Computer Science and Information Systems 2011, MCCSIS 2011, 2, 135–139.
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
&partnerID=40&md5=de934a89420c2ecc8eee8569d77218cc
Björklund, C., & Ahlskog-Björkman, E. (2017). Approaches to teaching in thematic work:
early childhood teachers’ integration of mathematics and art. International Journal of
Early Years Education, 25(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2017.1287061
Carpenter, D. D. (2005). Using learning objectives for course design and curriculum
improvement. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings,
–15316. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
&partnerID=40&md5=9d3ba475532a8918f29ff4e43b281dd6
Efriani, A., Pranita, S., & Anggara, B. (2024). An analysis of student errors in solving HOTS
mathematics problems based on the newman procedure. AIP Conference Proceedings,
(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201077
Gibson, G. (2016). Critical thinking: Theories, methods and challenges. In Critical Thinking: Theories, Methods and Challenges. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-
s2.0-85021984090&partnerID=40&md5=eeaffd10b6c6c58fd27181a7f45d6f1e
Goel, N., Deshmukh, K., Patel, B. C., & Chacko, S. (2020). Tools and rubrics for assessment
of learning outcomes. In Assessment Tools for Mapping Learning Outcomes With
Learning Objectives (hal. 211–254). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4784-7.ch013
Hall, S., Legault, A., & Cote, J. (2010). Dying means suffocating: Perceptions of people living
with severe COPD facing the end of life. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 16(9),
–457. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.9.78640
Ibrahim, W., Sweedan, A., Ibrahim, H., Marzouk, S., Ibrahim, W., & Zoubeidi, T. (2022).
Embedded Course Level Assessment for Effective Assessment of Program Learning
Outcomes. International Conference on Higher Education Advances, 2022-June, 57–64.
https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd22.2022.14597
Lee, T.-T. (2006). Nursing administrators’ experiences in managing PDA use for inpatient
units. CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing, 24(5), 280–287.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00024665-200609000-00010
Mdunyelwa, V., Futcher, L., & van Niekerk, J. (2025). Towards an Active Learning Approach
for the Design of a Secure Programming Course Using Constructive Alignment. IFIP
Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 722 IFIP, 16–30.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72563-0_2
Muknia. (2020). Integrative thematic learning model to shape the student’s character.
International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 606–610.
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
&partnerID=40&md5=f2c579fd569b03e5d586376efa01762a
Netta, A., & Safura, S. (2019). Lecturers’ methods in teaching speaking at the university of
Muhammadiyah Aceh. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1232(1).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1232/1/012033
Orr, R. B., Csikari, M. M., Freeman, S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2022). Writing and Using
Learning Objectives. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(3).
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-04-0073
Piaget, J. (2009). Intellectual Evolution from Adolescence to Adulthood. Human Development,
(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225
Reddy, Y. M. (2012). Examining the relationship between rubric assessment tools and
enhancement of student learning. International Journal of Management in Education, 6(3),
–293. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2012.064324
Remmen, K. B., & Frøyland, M. (2015). What happens in classrooms after earth science
fieldwork? Supporting student learning processes during follow-up activities.
International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(1), 24–42.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.967114
Sánchez-García, I., López-Medina, I. M., & Pancorbo-Hidalgo, P. L. (2013). Obstacles
perceived by nurses for evidence-based practice: A qualitative study. Enfermeria Clinica,
(6), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2013.09.001
Suryana, A., & Sarah, L. L. (2020). Measurement of national education standards: (Analysis
of achievement of accreditation results and improvement strategy). International Journal
of Information and Education Technology, 10(6), 416–421. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.6.1400
Susilo. (2019). KENDALA GURU DALAM MENERAPKAN KURIKULUM MERDEKA.
https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/Prosidingpps/article/view/2653
Syamsuddin, A., Babo, R., & Rahman, S. (2021). Mathematics learning interest of students
based on the difference in the implementation of model of thematic learning and characterintegrated thematic learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 581–591.
https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.2.581
Tampubolon, A., Sitorus, H. A., Nasution, M. S., & Saragih, M. P. (2024). Problematika
Pergantian Kurikulum Mengakibatkan Guru Kesulitan Menyesuaikan Konsep
Pembelajaran PKN di Sekolah Dasar. 3, 1–12.
Thompson, A. (2006). Effective training requires planning and commitment. Paperboard
Packaging, 91(3), 12. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
&partnerID=40&md5=443a7776413867abe0052c5c22ec4104
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Wiley.
https://books.google.co.id/books?id=VUrAvc8OB1YC
Utami, N., & Ramadan, Z. H. (2024). Kesulitan Guru dalam Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah
Dasar. 13(1), 919–926.
Verma, R. M., Devi, M., Bishnoi, S., & Jain, R. K. C. (2022). Critical Thinking Process and
Its Effect on Engineering. World Journal of English Language, 12(3), 149–156.
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n3p149
Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2024). Critical thinking. In Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and
Transdisciplinarity (hal. 124–128). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317967.ch27
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E.
Souberman (ed.)). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wadiyo, W., Haryono, S., Wiyoso, J., & Malarsih, M. (2024). Bridging musical gaps: creating
educational songs with thematic learning for primary school students. Rast Muzikoloji
Dergisi, 12(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.12975/rastmd.20241235
Williamson, T., & Long, A. F. (2005). Qualitative data analysis using data displays. Nurse
researcher, 12(3), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2005.01.12.3.7.c5944
Wulandari, D., Utomo, S. H., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2017). Waste bank: Waste management
model in improving local economy. International Journal of Energy Economics and
Policy, 7(3), 36–41. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
&partnerID=40&md5=dac6e8ac0fe6d835bd11ee610bd546b8
Xiong, Z., Feng, Z., & Zhong, Z. (2023). Research based on big data technology to stimulate
classroom vitality andcultivate double-high talents. ACM International Conference
Proceeding Series, 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637494.3638718
Zaqiah, Q. Y., Heryati, Y., & Narongraksakhet, I. (2021). Implementation of thematicintegrative learning to enhance students’ skill in the 4.0 era. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2),
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 EduBase : Journal of Basic Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



