PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Peer Review Process
All submissions to EduBase Journal undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality and validity of published research. This journal operates a double-blind peer review process, meaning that authors and reviewers are anonymous. The review process is carried out by experts in the relevant field of study, who evaluate the submitted manuscripts based on their scientific value, originality and relevance to the scope of the journal.
1. Initial evaluation: After receiving the manuscript, the editorial board will conduct an initial evaluation to ensure that the manuscript meets the scope and focus of the journal and complies with publication requirements. Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements will be rejected without further review. Manuscripts with more than 30% similarity will be rejected at this stage. The editorial office will check the article format and citation style and adhere to the specified author guidelines. If the required requirements are not met, the manuscript will be returned to the author to be reformatted and resubmitted. If the manuscript passes approval, it will be sent to the reviewer.
2. Assignment of reviewers: The editorial board will select two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field of study and have experience in the research area covered by the manuscript. The reviewers will not know the identity of the author, and the author will not know the identity of the reviewer. A list of author names, acknowledgments, and references to author contributions should be removed from the manuscript and posted on the Title page file. The assigned editor will then send invitations to reviewers. Invited reviewers are expected to be affiliated with a different institution than the corresponding author. Additionally, reviewers will consider such invitations based on their scientific expertise, potential conflicts of interest, and other relevant criteria. Our journal is committed to assigning reviewers within two weeks.
3. Review process: Reviewers will evaluate the manuscript based on scientific quality, originality, validity and relevance to the field of study. Reviewers are usually given two weeks to review the research results. They will provide constructive feedback to the author to help improve the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, rejection, or revision of the manuscript.
4. Decision: The editor-in-chief will make the final decision whether to accept, reject, or request revision of the manuscript based on the feedback provided by the reviewers and the manuscript's compliance with publication requirements. If the reviewers' comments/responses differ significantly, the academic editor may invite additional individuals to review the manuscript before making a final decision. The academic editor will send the decision (with rejection, acceptance, or need for major or minor revisions) to the author via the online system, along with relevant comments submitted by the reviewers. Because our journal adopts the double-blind, peer-review principle, all comments and suggestions remain anonymous. The average time from submission to first decision is one month, and from acceptance to publication is 2-4 weeks.
5. Revision process: If the manuscript is accepted with revisions, the author will be asked to revise the manuscript based on the feedback provided by the reviewers and send it back for further review. Resubmitted materials must include a revised manuscript with highlighted changes and a revision letter. Authors are usually given two weeks (for minor revisions) and four weeks (for major revisions) to revise the manuscript. The revised main manuscript will undergo a second round of review by the same reviewers, who will evaluate whether the revisions successfully address their feedback. For minor revisions, a further review process may not be necessary.
6. Publication: Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors will be asked to submit a final version of the manuscript, which will be copyedited and formatted for publication in the journal.
4. Decision: The editor-in-chief will make the final decision whether to accept, reject, or request revision of the manuscript based on the feedback provided by the reviewers and the manuscript's compliance with publication requirements. If the reviewers' comments/responses differ significantly, the academic editor may invite additional individuals to review the manuscript before making a final decision. The academic editor will send the decision (with rejection, acceptance, or need for major or minor revisions) to the author via the online system, along with relevant comments submitted by the reviewers. Because our journal adopts the double-blind, peer-review principle, all comments and suggestions remain anonymous. The average time from submission to first decision is one month, and from acceptance to publication is 2-4 weeks.
5. Revision process: If the manuscript is accepted with revisions, the author will be asked to revise the manuscript based on the feedback provided by the reviewers and send it back for further review. Resubmitted materials must include a revised manuscript with highlighted changes and a revision letter. Authors are usually given two weeks (for minor revisions) and four weeks (for major revisions) to revise the manuscript. The revised main manuscript will undergo a second round of review by the same reviewers, who will evaluate whether the revisions successfully address their feedback. For minor revisions, a further review process may not be necessary.
6. Publication: Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors will be asked to submit a final version of the manuscript, which will be copyedited and formatted for publication in the journal.
This peer review process will ensure that all manuscripts submitted to EduBase Journals are evaluated against the highest standards of scientific integrity and ethical conduct and that only research of the highest quality is published.
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement for Peer Review Process
EduBase is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and preventing publication malpractice in its peer review process. We adhere to the following guidelines:
1. Confidentiality: The peer review process is confidential, and all information regarding submitted manuscripts is handled with strict confidentiality. Editors, reviewers, and other parties involved must maintain confidentiality and not reveal any details about the manuscript or the review process.
2. Objectivity and Impartiality: Peer review is conducted objectively and impartially. Editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on their scientific value, relevance, and quality, without personal bias or conflict of interest. They should provide constructive feedback to writers to improve the quality of their work.
3. Timeliness: EduBase is committed to conducting peer reviews in a timely manner. Editors and reviewers are expected to complete their review process within a reasonable time frame. Authors will be productively informed about the status and progress of their manuscript throughout the review process.
4. Transparency and Accountability: The peer review process must be transparent and accountable. Reviewers are encouraged to provide clear, reasoned, and constructive feedback. Editors must make fair and informed decisions based on reviewers' comments and their own expertise.
5. Conflicts of Interest: Editors and reviewers must declare potential conflicts of interest that could affect their impartiality and objectivity in the review process. If a conflict of interest arises, appropriate action will be taken to ensure an impartial evaluation.
6. Plagiarism and Violation: Editors and reviewers must be vigilant in identifying potential cases of plagiarism, falsification of data, or other forms of research misconduct. Any suspected violations must be reported efficiently to the responsible authorities.
7. Peer Reviewer Recognition: Edubase recognizes the important contributions of peer reviewers and recognizes their expertise and dedication. The journal will provide appropriate recognition and reward to reviewers for their valuable contributions to the publication process.
1. Confidentiality: The peer review process is confidential, and all information regarding submitted manuscripts is handled with strict confidentiality. Editors, reviewers, and other parties involved must maintain confidentiality and not reveal any details about the manuscript or the review process.
2. Objectivity and Impartiality: Peer review is conducted objectively and impartially. Editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on their scientific value, relevance, and quality, without personal bias or conflict of interest. They should provide constructive feedback to writers to improve the quality of their work.
3. Timeliness: EduBase is committed to conducting peer reviews in a timely manner. Editors and reviewers are expected to complete their review process within a reasonable time frame. Authors will be productively informed about the status and progress of their manuscript throughout the review process.
4. Transparency and Accountability: The peer review process must be transparent and accountable. Reviewers are encouraged to provide clear, reasoned, and constructive feedback. Editors must make fair and informed decisions based on reviewers' comments and their own expertise.
5. Conflicts of Interest: Editors and reviewers must declare potential conflicts of interest that could affect their impartiality and objectivity in the review process. If a conflict of interest arises, appropriate action will be taken to ensure an impartial evaluation.
6. Plagiarism and Violation: Editors and reviewers must be vigilant in identifying potential cases of plagiarism, falsification of data, or other forms of research misconduct. Any suspected violations must be reported efficiently to the responsible authorities.
7. Peer Reviewer Recognition: Edubase recognizes the important contributions of peer reviewers and recognizes their expertise and dedication. The journal will provide appropriate recognition and reward to reviewers for their valuable contributions to the publication process.
EduBase is committed to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the peer review process. We strive to ensure fairness, transparency and ethical behavior in evaluating manuscripts, thereby upholding the quality and trustworthiness of the research published in our journal.
